KOID vs. PXQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KOID tracks the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index while PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KOID returned 61.07% vs 84.85% for PXQ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KOID charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.

Performance

KOID vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a 26.38% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 54.15% return.

KOID

• 1D: -5.61%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: 26.38%
• 6M: 29.73%
• 1Y: 61.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXQ

• 1D: -5.38%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 54.15%
• 6M: 54.94%
• 1Y: 84.85%
• 3Y*: 40.93%
• 5Y*: 19.32%
• 10Y*: 21.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOID vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	26.38%	27.04%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	54.15%	21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and PXQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.71

The correlation between KOID and PXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOID vs. PXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOID	PXQ
Technology	43.1%	84.4%
Industrials	37.2%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	14.7%	-
Basic Materials	4.9%	-
Communication Services	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	3.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KOID vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 71
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 65

PXQ

PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 93
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOID vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOID	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	3.42	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.96	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.57	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	6.94	-3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.20	30.00	-18.80

KOID vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and PXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOID vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and PXQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	PXQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-57.18%	+38.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-12.30%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-6.27%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-10.73%	+7.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.47%	2.84%	+2.63%

Volatility

KOID vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) is 11.66%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a volatility of 15.64%. This indicates that KOID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOID	PXQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.66%	15.64%	-3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.06%	21.75%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.15%	25.15%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.84%	23.96%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.84%	23.33%	+2.51%

KOID vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOID vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than PXQ's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.67%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.62%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOID and PXQ in my portfolio?

KOID and PXQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOID or PXQ?

PXQ has higher volatility (15.64%) compared to KOID (11.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -18.19% vs PXQ's -57.18%.

Which ETF is better, KOID or PXQ?

On 1-year performance, PXQ leads with 84.85% vs 61.07% for KOID. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 11.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOID or PXQ?

Over the 1-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 84.85% return vs 61.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOID or PXQ?

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KOID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOID or PXQ?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.62% for PXQ.

What is the main difference between KOID and PXQ?

KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index, while PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KOID and 0.40% for PXQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.