KOID vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. KOID is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, KOID returned 73.00% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. KOID charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

KOID vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a 33.89% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

KOID

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 33.89%
• 6M: 37.46%
• 1Y: 73.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOID vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	33.89%	27.04%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and BAMU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

KOID vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 82
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 80
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 74

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOID vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOID	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	5.01	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	8.84	-5.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.43	-0.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	24.72	-20.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	97.90	-84.47

KOID vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOID vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-0.36%	-17.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-0.12%	-18.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	0.00%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-0.02%	-3.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.45%	0.03%	+5.42%

Volatility

KOID vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that KOID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOID	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	0.09%	+10.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.18%	0.40%	+19.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.54%	0.58%	+24.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.25%	0.87%	+24.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.25%	0.87%	+24.38%

KOID vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOID vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.63%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOID and BAMU in my portfolio?

KOID and BAMU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOID or BAMU?

KOID has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -18.19% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, KOID or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 73.00% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOID or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 73.00% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOID or BAMU?

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOID or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.63% for KOID.

What is the main difference between KOID and BAMU?

KOID is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KOID and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.