KOCT vs. QTAP
KOCT (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - KOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000 Price Return Index, while QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. KOCT is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOCT returned 6.87%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for QTAP. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
KOCT vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOCT achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.
KOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.51%
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.75M | $948.54K | $494.45K | |
| $235.81K | $225.86K | $220.48K |
KOCT vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 11.23% | 10.14% | 11.08% | 9.02% | -7.87% | 3.40% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.57% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOCT and QTAP is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between KOCT and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
KOCT vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KOCT
QTAP
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
KOCT
QTAP
Financial Services
KOCT
QTAP
Technology
KOCT
QTAP
Industrials
KOCT
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
KOCT
QTAP
Real Estate
KOCT
QTAP
Energy
KOCT
QTAP
Basic Materials
KOCT
QTAP
Utilities
KOCT
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
KOCT
QTAP
Communication Services
KOCT
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOCT vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
KOCT
QTAP
KOCT vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOCT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.69 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 6.93 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | 33.23 | -16.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOCT vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOCT drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOCT and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOCT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -29.44% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -2.81% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -13.03% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | -29.44% | +12.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -1.05% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -4.91% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 0.59% | +0.73% |
Volatility
KOCT vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) is 1.35%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that KOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOCT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 2.75% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 5.69% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 6.61% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 18.92% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 18.57% | -4.11% |
KOCT vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KOCT and QTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
KOCT vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither KOCT nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.79% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOCT and QTAP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTAP has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to KOCT (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOCT dropped -28.22% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.30% vs 6.87% for KOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOCT and QTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
KOCT and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QTAP is Leveraged Equities.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOCT and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer