KO vs. VFC
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while VFC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KO returned 10.64%/yr vs -10.23%/yr for VFC. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KO vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, KO has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 10.64%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -10.23% annualized return.
KO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
VFC
- 1D
- -4.28%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -26.13%
- YTD
- -19.96%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- -7.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.75%
- 10Y*
- -10.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.49B | $1.47B | $1.44B | |
| $167.52M | $128.15M | $135.42M |
KO vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 26.97% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -19.96% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between KO and VFC is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KO and VFC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
KO:
$376.85B
VFC:
$5.63B
KO:
$3.32
VFC:
$0.89
KO:
26.39
VFC:
16.01
KO:
3.18
VFC:
0.29
KO:
7.54
VFC:
0.44
KO:
$50.13B
VFC:
$9.51B
KO:
$31.02B
VFC:
$4.28B
KO:
$19.57B
VFC:
$826.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KO vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
KO
VFC
KO vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KO | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 0.75 | +3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 1.85 | +7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KO vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KO | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -88.41% | +20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -33.20% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -63.66% | +48.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -86.34% | +69.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.99% | -88.41% | +51.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -82.46% | +80.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -21.85% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 13.49% | -9.89% |
Volatility
KO vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is 9.09%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that KO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KO | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 22.75% | -13.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 36.49% | -21.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 51.32% | -32.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 54.30% | -37.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 45.42% | -27.00% |
Dividends
KO vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than VFC's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.37% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.51% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
KO vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Coca-Cola Company and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KO vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of -106.89M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KO and VFC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to KO (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs VFC's -88.41%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KO and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer