KNT.TO vs. ULTA
KNT.TO (K92 Mining Inc.) and ULTA (Ulta Beauty, Inc.) are both stocks. KNT.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ULTA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KNT.TO returned 35.57%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for ULTA. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KNT.TO is traded in CAD, while ULTA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ULTA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, KNT.TO has outperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 35.57%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return.
KNT.TO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -19.54%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 56.58%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 35.57%
ULTA
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -21.04%
- 6M
- -21.06%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.92%
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc. | -0.18% | 161.41% | 33.33% | -15.12% | 6.68% | -5.52% | 164.24% | 242.86% | 55.56% | -44.33% |
ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | -21.04% | 32.75% | -3.72% | 1.97% | 20.97% | 43.52% | 10.75% | -0.87% | 18.67% | -18.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNT.TO and ULTA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
KNT.TO:
CA$5.60B
ULTA:
$20.56B
KNT.TO:
$1.28
ULTA:
$26.57
KNT.TO:
12.69
ULTA:
17.60
KNT.TO:
0.13
ULTA:
1.75
KNT.TO:
5.84
ULTA:
1.65
KNT.TO:
4.51
ULTA:
7.97
KNT.TO:
$685.77M
ULTA:
$12.71B
KNT.TO:
$495.11M
ULTA:
$5.00B
KNT.TO:
$499.16M
ULTA:
$1.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNT.TO vs. ULTA — Risk / Return Rank
KNT.TO
ULTA
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNT.TO | ULTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.11 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 0.26 | +2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.67%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -83.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and ULTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNT.TO | ULTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.67% | -83.51% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.35% | -33.33% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.35% | -42.47% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.53% | -42.47% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.47% | -62.07% | -18.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.72% | -32.12% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -19.94% | -22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.88% | 13.78% | +1.10% |
Volatility
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison
K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.12% compared to Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) at 9.73%. This indicates that KNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNT.TO | ULTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.12% | 9.73% | +8.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.76% | 25.51% | +14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.55% | 34.20% | +16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.19% | 34.77% | +14.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.20% | 38.90% | +19.30% |
Dividends
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison
Neither KNT.TO nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between K92 Mining Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KNT.TO vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison
KNT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
ULTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
KNT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
ULTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
KNT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.
ULTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KNT.TO and ULTA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KNT.TO and ULTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer