PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNT.TO vs. TEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KNT.TO is traded in CAD, while TEL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TEL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than TEL's -4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, KNT.TO has outperformed TEL with an annualized return of 35.57%, while TEL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.34% annualized return.


KNT.TO

1D
1.34%
1M
-19.54%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
2.86%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
56.58%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*
35.57%

TEL

1D
1.56%
1M
3.85%
YTD
-4.90%
6M
-6.55%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
-0.18%161.41%33.33%-15.12%6.68%-5.52%164.24%242.86%55.56%-44.33%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
-4.90%54.23%12.28%21.66%-23.08%35.05%25.89%24.03%-12.05%30.41%

Correlation

The correlation between KNT.TO and TEL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011

0.07

Over the past year, KNT.TO and TEL have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNT.TO:

CA$5.60B

TEL:

$62.06B

EPS

KNT.TO:

$1.28

TEL:

$9.78

PE Ratio

KNT.TO:

12.69

TEL:

21.50

PEG Ratio

KNT.TO:

0.13

TEL:

3.98

PS Ratio

KNT.TO:

5.84

TEL:

3.37

PB Ratio

KNT.TO:

4.51

TEL:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$685.77M

TEL:

$18.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$495.11M

TEL:

$6.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$499.16M

TEL:

$4.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNT.TO vs. TEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNT.TO
KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TEL
TEL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNT.TOTELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.38

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

2.95

-0.06

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the TEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNT.TO and TEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.67%, which is greater than TEL's maximum drawdown of -76.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and TEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNT.TOTELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.67%

-76.38%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.35%

-22.99%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.35%

-23.65%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.53%

-31.18%

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.47%

-42.47%

-38.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.72%

-15.33%

-16.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-12.75%

-29.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.88%

10.70%

+4.18%

Volatility

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Volatility Comparison

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.12% compared to TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) at 10.14%. This indicates that KNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNT.TOTELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.12%

10.14%

+7.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.76%

28.56%

+11.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.55%

34.30%

+16.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.19%

28.80%

+20.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.20%

28.98%

+29.22%

Dividends

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Dividend Comparison

KNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
1.38%1.22%1.78%1.66%1.90%1.23%1.57%1.90%2.27%1.65%2.08%1.98%

Financials

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between K92 Mining Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
232.41M
4.74B
(KNT.TO) Total Revenue
(TEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KNT.TO vs. TEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between K92 Mining Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
73.5%
36.8%
Portfolio components
KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

TEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

TEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.

TEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNT.TO and TEL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNT.TO and TEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer