PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNRG vs. YGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNRG vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNRG achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's -19.59% return.


KNRG

1D
0.23%
1M
0.02%
6M
2.10%
YTD
2.99%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.88%

YGLD

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.71%
6M
-26.53%
YTD
-19.59%
1Y
9.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$293.39K$543.91K$460.19K
$361.73K$352.45K$498.49K

KNRG vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNRG and YGLD is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNRG vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNRG
KNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
KNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNRG vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNRGYGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.08

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.22

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

0.43

+12.24

KNRG vs. YGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the YGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNRG and YGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNRG vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNRG drawdown since its inception was -2.71%, smaller than the maximum YGLD drawdown of -43.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNRG and YGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNRGYGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-43.35%

+40.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-43.35%

+40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-41.97%

+41.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-11.07%

+10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

21.97%

-21.40%

Volatility

KNRG vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is 0.75%, while Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that KNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNRGYGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

8.41%

-7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

30.62%

-28.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

42.39%

-39.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.38%

38.99%

-35.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

38.99%

-35.61%

KNRG vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNRG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNRG vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison

KNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than YGLD's 22.77% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNRG and YGLD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YGLD has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to KNRG (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNRG dropped -2.71% vs YGLD's -43.35%.

On 1-year performance, YGLD leads with 9.43% vs 7.16% for KNRG. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNRG has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YGLD has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KNRG.

YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 22.77%, compared with 6.91% for KNRG.

KNRG is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while YGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KNRG and 0.50% for YGLD.

KNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNRG and YGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer