PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNRG vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNRG vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNRG achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.44% return.


KNRG

1D
0.09%
1M
0.52%
6M
2.74%
YTD
3.06%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNRG vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNRG and UUP is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNRG vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNRG
KNRG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
KNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNRG vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNRGUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.25

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.28

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.03

6.26

+8.77

KNRG vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNRG and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNRG vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNRG drawdown since its inception was -2.71%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNRG and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNRGUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-22.19%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-3.65%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-8.88%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.33%

-0.77%

Volatility

KNRG vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is 0.55%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that KNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNRGUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

1.45%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

4.34%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

6.03%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.41%

7.22%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.41%

6.90%

-3.49%

KNRG vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNRG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNRG vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

KNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNRG
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF
6.90%4.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNRG and UUP have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to KNRG (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNRG dropped -2.71% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, KNRG leads with 8.40% vs 8.28% for UUP. On fees, UUP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNRG has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNRG has performed better with a 8.40% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UUP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KNRG.

KNRG has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.

KNRG is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KNRG and 0.75% for UUP.

KNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNRG and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer