PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNRG vs. FTBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNRG vs. FTBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNRG achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than FTBD's 0.99% return.


KNRG

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.49%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTBD

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.67%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNRG vs. FTBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNRG and FTBD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

0.57

The correlation between KNRG and FTBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNRG vs. FTBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNRG
FTBD

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

KNRG
100.0%
FTBD

-

Basic Materials

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Communication Services

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Consumer Cyclical

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Consumer Defensive

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Energy

KNRG

-

FTBD
100.0%

Financial Services

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Healthcare

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Industrials

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Real Estate

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Technology

KNRG

-

FTBD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNRG vs. FTBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNRG
KNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBD
FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNRG vs. FTBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) and Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNRGFTBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.27

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.18

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

7.50

+8.62

KNRG vs. FTBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FTBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNRG and FTBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNRGFTBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.51

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.77

0.75

+2.02

Drawdowns

KNRG vs. FTBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNRG drawdown since its inception was -2.71%, smaller than the maximum FTBD drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNRG and FTBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNRGFTBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.98%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.98%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.15%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-1.57%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.87%

-0.29%

Volatility

KNRG vs. FTBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is 0.74%, while Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that KNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNRGFTBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.47%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

3.17%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

4.32%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

5.87%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

5.87%

-2.34%

KNRG vs. FTBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNRG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNRG vs. FTBD - Dividend Comparison

KNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than FTBD's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTBD
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
5.03%5.04%4.76%4.69%
KNRG
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF
6.95%4.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNRG and FTBD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBD has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to KNRG (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNRG dropped -2.71% vs FTBD's -6.98%.

On 1-year performance, KNRG leads with 9.32% vs 6.48% for FTBD. On fees, FTBD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, KNRG has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNRG has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTBD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KNRG.

KNRG has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 5.03% for FTBD.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KNRG and 0.55% for FTBD.

KNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNRG and FTBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer