PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGZ vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.


KNGZ

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.05%
6M
11.93%
YTD
16.14%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
-0.43%
1M
15.85%
6M
10.45%
YTD
8.06%
1Y
116.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNGZ and WNTR is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGZ vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGZWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.60

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

6.69

+1.00

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGZ and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGZWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-42.65%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-42.65%

+33.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-11.84%

+10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-20.57%

+15.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

16.58%

-13.65%

Volatility

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is 3.65%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that KNGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGZWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

18.80%

-15.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

47.57%

-37.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

53.81%

-40.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

53.62%

-37.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

53.62%

-34.81%

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGZ vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.51%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
104.11%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGZ and WNTR have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to KNGZ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 23.41% for KNGZ. On fees, KNGZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNGZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 23.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNGZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 2.51% for KNGZ.

KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGZ and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer