PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGZ vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 95.37% return.


KNGZ

1D
0.27%
1M
7.21%
YTD
17.00%
6M
16.85%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
31.17%
YTD
95.37%
6M
95.99%
1Y
276.75%
3Y*
62.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
17.00%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%3.44%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
95.37%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGZ and HIBL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.72

The correlation between KNGZ and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNGZ
HIBL

Financial Services

14.9%
12.5%

Industrials

14.9%
11.7%

Technology

14.9%
45.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
12.9%

Healthcare

11.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
0.6%

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Utilities

5.9%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.0%
3.7%

Energy

4.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

KNGZ
14.9%
HIBL
12.5%

Industrials

KNGZ
14.9%
HIBL
11.7%

Technology

KNGZ
14.9%
HIBL
45.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KNGZ
11.9%
HIBL
12.9%

Healthcare

KNGZ
11.9%
HIBL
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

KNGZ
6.9%
HIBL
0.6%

Real Estate

KNGZ
5.9%
HIBL

-

Utilities

KNGZ
5.9%
HIBL
3.2%

Communication Services

KNGZ
5.0%
HIBL
3.7%

Energy

KNGZ
4.0%
HIBL
2.2%

Basic Materials

KNGZ
3.0%
HIBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGZ vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGZHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

8.88

-5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

32.55

-21.02

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGZ and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGZHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

4.23

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.14

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.24

+0.37

Drawdowns

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGZHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-88.27%

+50.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-31.39%

+21.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-69.66%

+49.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-81.58%

+61.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.70%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-44.17%

+39.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

8.55%

-5.76%

Volatility

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is 3.76%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that KNGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGZHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

21.02%

-17.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

50.42%

-40.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

65.96%

-52.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

82.15%

-66.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

91.87%

-73.00%

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGZ vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGZ and HIBL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to KNGZ (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.47% vs 9.34% for KNGZ. On fees, KNGZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNGZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNGZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

KNGZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.18% for HIBL.

KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGZ and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer