PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and XML.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. KNGG.TO is actively managed, while XML.TO is passively managed. At 0.37, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

KNGG.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XML.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
2.46%
YTD
7.43%
6M
12.55%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
KNGG.TO
Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF		0.44%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and XML.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with KNGG.TO:
KNGG.TO vs. PAYG.TOKNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TOKNGG.TO vs. CYH.TOKNGG.TO vs. KNGX.TOKNGG.TO vs. XAW.TOKNGG.TO vs. BREA.TOKNGG.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
Often compared with XML.TO:
XML.TO vs. XIN.TOXML.TO vs. XEQT.TOXML.TO vs. XSP.TOXML.TO vs. HXQ.TOXML.TO vs. XMU.TOXML.TO vs. XMW.TOXML.TO vs. XMI.TO

Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KNGG.TO
XML.TO
XML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KNGG.TOXML.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

2.52

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.09

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.64

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.65

+0.98

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum XML.TO drawdown of -28.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and XML.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

KNGG.TOXML.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-28.62%

+27.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-4.88%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-12.34%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.62%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.00%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-3.42%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.37%

—

Volatility

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

KNGG.TOXML.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

3.79%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

6.73%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

9.09%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

9.68%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.85%

12.13%

-2.28%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. XML.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
KNGG.TO
Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.57%2.76%2.67%2.56%2.02%1.92%1.11%3.62%2.77%1.92%3.34%