KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and MEQT.TO (Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At 0.22, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KNGG.TO

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.44%
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and MEQT.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.22

Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQT.TO

MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNGG.TO	MEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	1.91	-0.28

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum MEQT.TO drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and MEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNGG.TO	MEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-15.14%	+13.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-1.22%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-1.34%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KNGG.TO	MEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.85%	11.57%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	11.94%	-2.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.85%	11.94%	-2.09%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	1.57%	1.60%	1.73%	0.81%