KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO
KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) and TCLV.TO (TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. KNGC.TO is passively managed, while TCLV.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, KNGC.TO returned 37.43% vs 17.36% for TCLV.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KNGC.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for TCLV.TO.
Performance
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNGC.TO achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly higher than TCLV.TO's 8.67% return.
KNGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 37.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCLV.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 14.18% | 41.07% | -4.91% |
TCLV.TO TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF | 8.67% | 24.55% | 10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGC.TO and TCLV.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGC.TO
TCLV.TO
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNGC.TO | TCLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.39 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.63 | 3.60 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.55 | 14.41 | +8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, which is greater than TCLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGC.TO and TCLV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGC.TO | TCLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.52% | -15.27% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -4.84% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -0.25% | -4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.02% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) at 2.64%. This indicates that KNGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNGC.TO | TCLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.64% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 6.70% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 8.24% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 9.70% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 9.76% | +7.84% |
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNGC.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLV.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNGC.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than TCLV.TO's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 1.63% | 1.69% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCLV.TO TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF | 1.82% | 1.88% | 2.68% | 3.15% | 2.84% | 2.64% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNGC.TO and TCLV.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for TCLV.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for KNGC.TO and 0.33% for TCLV.TO.
Find the right allocation for KNGC.TO and TCLV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer