PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNF vs. KEQU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNF vs. KEQU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knife River Corporation (KNF) and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNF achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than KEQU's 8.45% return.


KNF

1D
-0.14%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
11.49%
6M
5.97%
1Y
-14.48%
3Y*
26.71%
5Y*
10Y*

KEQU

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.57%
YTD
8.45%
6M
6.45%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
37.52%
5Y*
28.73%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNF vs. KEQU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KNF
Knife River Corporation
11.49%-30.79%53.58%88.98%
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
8.45%-39.53%112.83%86.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KNF and KEQU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2023

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNF:

$4.45B

KEQU:

$121.02M

EPS

KNF:

$2.58

KEQU:

$3.73

PE Ratio

KNF:

30.42

KEQU:

10.89

PEG Ratio

KNF:

3.47

KEQU:

0.04

PS Ratio

KNF:

1.39

KEQU:

0.42

PB Ratio

KNF:

2.85

KEQU:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNF:

$3.20B

KEQU:

$287.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNF:

$585.88M

KEQU:

$83.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

KNF:

$441.86M

KEQU:

$26.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNF vs. KEQU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNF
KNF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

KEQU
KEQU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
KEQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEQU Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KEQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEQU Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNF vs. KEQU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knife River Corporation (KNF) and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNFKEQUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.31

0.08

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.15

0.57

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.08

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.13

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

0.19

-1.07

KNF vs. KEQU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNF Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the KEQU Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNF and KEQU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNFKEQUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

0.08

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.15

+0.58

Drawdowns

KNF vs. KEQU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNF drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, smaller than the maximum KEQU drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNF and KEQU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNFKEQUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.15%

-79.95%

+35.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.15%

-43.35%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.15%

-55.36%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.91%

-41.77%

+14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-32.24%

+19.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

29.59%

-10.67%

Volatility

KNF vs. KEQU - Volatility Comparison

Knife River Corporation (KNF) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) at 9.14%. This indicates that KNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEQU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNFKEQUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.82%

9.14%

+5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.49%

25.78%

+11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.33%

55.23%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.33%

50.37%

-8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

47.05%

-4.72%

Dividends

KNF vs. KEQU - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNF nor KEQU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.24%2.17%2.21%2.29%2.81%
KNF
Knife River Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KNF vs. KEQU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knife River Corporation and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
410.10M
69.40M
(KNF) Total Revenue
(KEQU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KNF vs. KEQU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Knife River Corporation and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
-0.7%
26.7%
Portfolio components
KNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.80M and revenue of 410.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.7%.

KEQU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 18.55M and revenue of 69.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

KNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported an operating income of -86.30M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

KEQU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58M and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

KNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a net income of -79.20M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in a net margin of -19.3%.

KEQU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 692.00K and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNF and KEQU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNF has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to KEQU (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNF dropped -44.15% vs KEQU's -79.95%.

KEQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNF and KEQU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer