KNF vs. KEQU
KNF (Knife River Corporation) and KEQU (Kewaunee Scientific Corporation) are both stocks. KNF operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while KEQU operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, KNF returned 23.88%/yr vs 27.70%/yr for KEQU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNF vs. KEQU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNF achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly higher than KEQU's -5.70% return.
KNF
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 20.00%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEQU
- 1D
- -4.81%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- -4.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
KNF vs. KEQU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KNF Knife River Corporation | 23.16% | -30.79% | 53.58% | 83.83% |
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | -5.70% | -39.53% | 112.83% | 74.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNF and KEQU is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2023 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
KNF:
$4.91B
KEQU:
$105.23M
KNF:
$2.58
KEQU:
$3.73
KNF:
33.61
KEQU:
9.47
KNF:
3.83
KEQU:
0.03
KNF:
1.54
KEQU:
0.36
KNF:
3.15
KEQU:
1.49
KNF:
$3.20B
KEQU:
$287.75M
KNF:
$585.88M
KEQU:
$83.23M
KNF:
$441.86M
KEQU:
$26.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNF vs. KEQU — Risk / Return Rank
KNF
KEQU
KNF vs. KEQU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knife River Corporation (KNF) and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNF | KEQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.10 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | -0.14 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNF vs. KEQU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNF drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, smaller than the maximum KEQU drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNF and KEQU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNF | KEQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.15% | -79.95% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.63% | -43.35% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.15% | -55.36% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.26% | -49.36% | +30.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -32.26% | +19.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.98% | 30.86% | -12.88% |
Volatility
KNF vs. KEQU - Volatility Comparison
Knife River Corporation (KNF) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) at 9.46%. This indicates that KNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEQU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNF | KEQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.59% | 9.46% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.77% | 26.30% | +12.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.67% | 55.08% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.53% | 50.29% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.53% | 47.02% | -4.49% |
Dividends
KNF vs. KEQU - Dividend Comparison
Neither KNF nor KEQU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.24% | 2.17% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.81% |
KNF Knife River Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KNF vs. KEQU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knife River Corporation and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KNF vs. KEQU - Profitability Comparison
KNF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.80M and revenue of 410.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.7%.
KEQU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 18.55M and revenue of 69.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.
KNF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported an operating income of -86.30M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
KEQU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58M and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
KNF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a net income of -79.20M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in a net margin of -19.3%.
KEQU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 692.00K and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KNF and KEQU have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNF has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to KEQU (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNF dropped -44.15% vs KEQU's -79.95%.
KNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNF and KEQU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer