PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 21.42%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
-0.63%
1M
26.38%
YTD
63.41%
6M
62.53%
1Y
99.38%
3Y*
43.36%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
21.42%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
63.41%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and SPHD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between KNCT and SPHD has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KNCT vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
SPHD

Technology

80.8%
1.5%

Communication Services

14.0%
8.6%

Real Estate

4.1%
20.1%

Industrials

1.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

17.8%

Energy

-

14.1%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Utilities

-

13.7%

Technology

KNCT
80.8%
SPHD
1.5%

Communication Services

KNCT
14.0%
SPHD
8.6%

Real Estate

KNCT
4.1%
SPHD
20.1%

Industrials

KNCT
1.1%
SPHD
0.0%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
SPHD
15.6%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

SPHD

-

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

SPHD
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

SPHD
17.8%

Energy

KNCT

-

SPHD
14.1%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

SPHD
5.1%

Utilities

KNCT

-

SPHD
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNCTSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.13

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.00

1.11

+8.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.01

2.78

+41.23

KNCT vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNCTSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

0.74

+3.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.39

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.40

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.58

0.00

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-41.39%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-7.33%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-13.29%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-19.50%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-41.39%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-5.37%

+4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-4.70%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.93%

-0.66%

Volatility

KNCT vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

2.99%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

7.55%

+9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

11.04%

+10.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

14.16%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

17.64%

+5.33%

KNCT vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and SPHD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.42% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.

KNCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPHD is S&P 500. KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.30% for SPHD.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer