KNCT vs. QTUM
KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KNCT returned 21.73%/yr vs 29.15%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
KNCT vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 53.29% return.
KNCT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | -15.09% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNCT and QTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between KNCT and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
KNCT vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KNCT
QTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
KNCT
QTUM
Communication Services
KNCT
QTUM
Real Estate
KNCT
QTUM
-
Industrials
KNCT
QTUM
Financial Services
KNCT
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
KNCT
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
KNCT
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
KNCT
-
QTUM
-
Energy
KNCT
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
KNCT
-
QTUM
Utilities
KNCT
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNCT vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
KNCT
QTUM
KNCT vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNCT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.70 | 3.65 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.72 | 4.26 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.55 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.00 | 6.28 | +3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.01 | 23.69 | +20.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNCT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 3.65 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.10 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.08 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
KNCT vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNCT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -38.45% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -15.26% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -25.39% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -38.45% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.59% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -8.25% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 4.04% | -1.77% |
Volatility
KNCT vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) is 9.19%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that KNCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNCT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 9.76% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 20.35% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 26.26% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 26.56% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 27.17% | -4.20% |
KNCT vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KNCT and QTUM have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
KNCT vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNCT and QTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to KNCT (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 21.73% for KNCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, KNCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 21.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KNCT and QTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.
KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance.
KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNCT and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer