KMLM vs. EAPCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) and EAPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) are both funds - KMLM is a Long-Short fund actively managed by CICC, while EAPCX is a Commodities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 5 years, KMLM returned 4.37%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for EAPCX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KMLM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for EAPCX.

Performance

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 21.68% return.

KMLM

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 13.52%
• 1Y: 12.84%
• 3Y*: -0.53%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

EAPCX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 21.68%
• 6M: 24.42%
• 1Y: 41.33%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	10.60%	-2.98%	-1.69%	-5.66%	30.61%	7.04%	5.40%
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	21.68%	22.06%	9.63%	-4.87%	17.26%	29.92%	4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and EAPCX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020	0.17

The correlation between KMLM and EAPCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KMLM vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM

KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 36
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 44

EAPCX

EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KMLM	EAPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	3.15	-2.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	3.99	-2.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.56	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	5.91	-3.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	21.29	-13.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and EAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KMLM	EAPCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	3.15	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.97	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.30	+0.19

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and EAPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMLM	EAPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.47%	-52.59%	+25.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.30%	-7.22%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.28%	-10.57%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.47%	-18.05%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.76%	-4.44%	-9.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-22.77%	+10.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	2.00%	-0.09%

Volatility

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 4.15%. This indicates that KMLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMLM	EAPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.15%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	11.72%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	13.92%	-2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	14.64%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.74%	13.26%	+1.48%

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMLM vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than EAPCX's 10.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	10.87%	13.23%	5.46%	3.43%	14.80%	13.74%	3.01%	1.11%	0.41%	4.98%	6.49%
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	4.54%	5.02%	0.82%	0.00%	13.22%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMLM and EAPCX in my portfolio?

KMLM and EAPCX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMLM or EAPCX?

KMLM has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to EAPCX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLM dropped -27.47% vs EAPCX's -52.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.