PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMDY vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMDY vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDY achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 20.76% return.


CMDY

1D
-1.43%
1M
-9.33%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.70%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
0.00%
1M
2.33%
YTD
20.76%
6M
18.72%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMDY vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
14.22%15.81%5.43%-9.33%14.55%26.38%1.15%3.34%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
20.76%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CMDY and AVUV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between CMDY and AVUV has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMDY vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDY vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMDYAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.85

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

14.37

-7.21

CMDY vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDY and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMDY vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDY drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDY and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMDYAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-49.42%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-7.95%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-28.79%

+16.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-28.79%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.56%

-1.61%

-10.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-7.89%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.68%

+0.41%

Volatility

CMDY vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is 3.63%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that CMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMDYAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

4.28%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

11.39%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.35%

17.63%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

22.65%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

28.22%

-13.59%

CMDY vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMDY vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than AVUV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.63%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
11.29%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMDY and AVUV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to CMDY (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMDY dropped -31.19% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.59% vs 9.18% for CMDY. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 1.63% for AVUV.

CMDY is categorized as Commodities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CMDY and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMDY and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer