KMLI vs. BITI
KMLI (KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMLI is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. KMLI is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, KMLI returned -56.04% vs 64.61% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. KMLI charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
KMLI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -28.41% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.
KMLI
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 20.50%
- 6M
- -32.99%
- YTD
- -28.41%
- 1Y
- -56.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 35.86%
- YTD
- 24.48%
- 1Y
- 64.61%
- 3Y*
- -31.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF | -28.41% | -38.14% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 24.48% | 20.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMLI and BITI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMLI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
KMLI
BITI
KMLI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMLI | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.25 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.57 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 6.38 | -7.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMLI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMLI | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.23% | -92.16% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.49% | -25.28% | -44.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.16% | -86.41% | +23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.67% | -68.40% | +24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.81% | 10.16% | +34.65% |
Volatility
KMLI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) has a higher volatility of 17.99% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.76%. This indicates that KMLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMLI | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.99% | 10.76% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.32% | 34.28% | +26.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.27% | 44.15% | +35.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.86% | 52.24% | +25.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.86% | 52.24% | +25.62% |
KMLI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMLI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.62% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF | 14.85% | 10.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMLI and BITI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMLI has higher volatility (17.99%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLI dropped -73.23% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs -56.04% for KMLI. On fees, BITI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs -56.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 14.85% for KMLI.
KMLI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMLI and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer