KMKNX vs. FISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX).
KMKNX is an actively managed fund by Kinetics. It was launched on Jan 31, 2006. FISGX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 28, 1989.
Performance
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 22.52% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 19.56% | 22.76% | -10.68% | 47.26% |
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | -1.09% | 7.83% | 13.65% | 20.26% | -30.11% | 5.01% | 46.58% | 66.58% | -9.33% | 24.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMKNX achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly higher than FISGX's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, KMKNX has outperformed FISGX with an annualized return of 21.10%, while FISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.
KMKNX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 21.10%
FISGX
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMKNX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FISGX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KMKNX vs. FISGX — Risk / Return Rank
KMKNX
FISGX
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMKNX | FISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.89 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.41 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.34 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | 5.16 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMKNX | FISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.89 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.06 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between KMKNX and FISGX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Dividend Comparison
KMKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than FISGX's 8.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | 8.44% | 8.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.94% | 9.97% | 38.61% | 19.12% | 17.17% | 4.01% | 7.82% |
Drawdowns
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMKNX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, which is greater than FISGX's maximum drawdown of -57.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMKNX and FISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMKNX | FISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.47% | -57.51% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.52% | -13.30% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.47% | -43.30% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.47% | -43.30% | +11.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.15% | -7.90% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -9.89% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.58% | 3.45% | +7.13% |
Volatility
KMKNX vs. FISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) is 7.07%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that KMKNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KMKNX | FISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 8.56% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.87% | 15.00% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.61% | 23.73% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 23.36% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 23.89% | -0.50% |