PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISGX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISGX achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FISGX has outperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 13.63%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return.


FISGX

1D
1.23%
1M
5.71%
YTD
15.94%
6M
14.93%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
13.63%

FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISGX
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund
15.94%7.83%13.65%20.26%-30.11%5.01%46.58%66.58%-9.33%24.98%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FISGX and FSMAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between FISGX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISGX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISGX
FISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISGXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.12

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

11.05

-1.08

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISGX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISGXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.87

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.31

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Drawdowns

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISGX drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISGX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISGXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-50.55%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-10.26%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.16%

-26.82%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.30%

-36.31%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.30%

-50.55%

+7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-12.17%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.90%

+0.15%

Volatility

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISGXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

4.70%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

12.46%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

17.17%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.45%

22.33%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

30.24%

-6.24%

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISGX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

FISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISGX
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund
7.20%8.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.94%9.97%38.61%19.12%17.17%4.01%7.82%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FISGX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to FSMAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISGX dropped -57.51% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISGX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer