KMID vs. XMMO
KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. KMID is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past year, KMID returned -0.13% vs 23.97% for XMMO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KMID charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
KMID vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMID achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 16.50% return.
KMID
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
KMID vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 3.26% | 0.31% | -3.02% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 16.50% | 13.04% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMID and XMMO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024 | 0.72 |
The correlation between KMID and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
KMID vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KMID
XMMO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
KMID
XMMO
Technology
KMID
XMMO
Financial Services
KMID
XMMO
Healthcare
KMID
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
KMID
XMMO
Basic Materials
KMID
-
XMMO
Communication Services
KMID
-
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
KMID
-
XMMO
Energy
KMID
-
XMMO
Real Estate
KMID
-
XMMO
Utilities
KMID
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMID vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
KMID
XMMO
KMID vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.21 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 2.76 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 9.60 | -9.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMID vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMID drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMID and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -55.37% | +36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -8.71% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -7.50% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -9.42% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.51% | +1.92% |
Volatility
KMID vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) is 4.06%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that KMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 6.93% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 17.50% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 20.67% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 21.75% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 22.35% | -5.52% |
KMID vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMID has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMID vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMID and XMMO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to KMID (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMID dropped -18.89% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 1-year performance, XMMO leads with 23.97% vs -0.13% for KMID. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 23.97% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.11% for KMID.
KMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for KMID and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMID and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer