KLXY vs. RTH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KLXY (Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - KLXY tracks the Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLXY charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.

Performance

KLXY vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KLXY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RTH

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 7.77%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 13.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLXY vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	-0.86%	13.69%	-6.39%	2.48%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	1.87%	12.36%	20.02%	8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between KLXY and RTH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2023	0.49

The correlation between KLXY and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KLXY vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KLXY	RTH
Consumer Cyclical	73.2%	56.4%
Consumer Defensive	21.8%	27.6%
Healthcare	4.9%	13.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KLXY vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 21
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLXY vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLXY	RTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.50	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KLXY	RTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-42.32%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.85%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.34%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLXY	RTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.07%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.81%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.54%	—

KLXY vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLXY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KLXY vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

KLXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than RTH's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.74%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.95%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLXY and RTH in my portfolio?

KLXY and RTH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KLXY or RTH?

On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KLXY or RTH?

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KLXY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KLXY or RTH?

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.85% for KLXY.

What is the main difference between KLXY and RTH?

KLXY tracks Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KLXY and 0.35% for RTH.