KLXY vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KLXY (Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. KLXY is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLXY charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

KLXY vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KLXY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: -6.74%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLXY vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	-0.86%	13.69%	-6.39%	2.48%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between KLXY and EATZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2023	0.50

KLXY vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KLXY	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	73.2%	78.2%
Consumer Defensive	21.8%	16.9%
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KLXY vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLXY vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLXY	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KLXY	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.40%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-13.56%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.40%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLXY	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.81%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.65%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.60%	—

KLXY vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLXY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

KLXY vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

KLXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.74%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLXY and EATZ in my portfolio?

KLXY and EATZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KLXY or EATZ?

On fees, KLXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KLXY or EATZ?

KLXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KLXY or EATZ?

KLXY has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between KLXY and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KLXY and 1.00% for EATZ.