KLMT vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
KLMT and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KLMT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index. It was launched on Jun 26, 2024. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both KLMT and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KLMT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KLMT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF | -1.54% | 21.31% | 4.94% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.64% | 20.85% | 6.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMT achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.64% return.
KLMT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 6M
- -2.75%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KLMT vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
KLMT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
KLMT
QQQM
KLMT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLMT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.63 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.95 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 7.03 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLMT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.64 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMT and QQQM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KLMT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF | 1.99% | 1.95% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
KLMT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -35.04% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -11.96% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.01% | -7.75% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -8.47% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 3.48% | -0.82% |
Volatility
KLMT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 6.06% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KLMT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 6.37% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 12.78% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 22.43% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 22.23% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 22.26% | -6.25% |