PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMT vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KLMT vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KLMT vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
-1.54%21.31%4.94%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
2.86%11.86%4.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMT achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 2.86% return.


KLMT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
0.14%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INKM

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
2.86%
6M
3.70%
1Y
12.06%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLMT vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KLMT vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMT
KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMT vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLMTINKMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.40

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

1.98

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.94

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.52

8.50

-0.98

KLMT vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMT and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMTINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.40

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.56

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between KLMT and INKM is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KLMT vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than INKM's 4.99% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
1.99%1.95%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.99%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%

Drawdowns

KLMT vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and INKM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMTINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-28.58%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-4.55%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-2.85%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-3.73%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.31%

+1.35%

Volatility

KLMT vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 2.98%. This indicates that KLMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KLMTINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

2.98%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

4.62%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

7.83%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

8.30%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

9.77%

+6.24%