PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMN vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMN vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KLMN having a 8.89% return and ITOT slightly lower at 8.76%.


KLMN

1D
-2.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
8.89%
6M
8.64%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-2.71%
1M
0.38%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.31%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
14.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMN vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
8.89%18.24%-3.62%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
8.76%17.00%-3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMN and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.98

The correlation between KLMN and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMN vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMN
KLMN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMN vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLMNITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.92

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

13.34

-0.08

KLMN vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMN and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMNITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.08

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.57

+0.33

Drawdowns

KLMN vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMN and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMNITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-55.20%

+36.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-8.90%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-2.95%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-6.97%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.94%

+0.03%

Volatility

KLMN vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is 3.49%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that KLMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMNITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.93%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

9.56%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

12.51%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.66%

17.39%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

18.28%

-0.62%

KLMN vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KLMN vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than ITOT's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
1.30%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, KLMN and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to KLMN (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLMN dropped -19.16% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 1-year performance, KLMN leads with 26.10% vs 25.86% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, KLMN has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KLMN has performed better with a 26.10% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for KLMN.

KLMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.

KLMN tracks MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KLMN and 0.03% for ITOT.

KLMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMN and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer