PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMH.DE achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than AEGE.DE's -0.53% return.


KLMH.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
0.13%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
-2.83%
10Y*

AEGE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
0.70%
3Y*
1.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KLMH.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.21%1.14%1.55%7.19%-19.81%-1.96%
AEGE.DE
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.53%2.29%1.46%4.27%-13.83%-1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.74

The correlation between KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMH.DE
KLMH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AEGE.DE
AEGE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AEGE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLMH.DEAEGE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.04

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

0.25

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

0.62

-0.52

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the AEGE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, which is greater than AEGE.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMH.DEAEGE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-17.22%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.76%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.63%

-3.94%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.51%

-8.70%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-10.21%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.13%

+0.15%

Volatility

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE) at 1.04%. This indicates that KLMH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEGE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMH.DEAEGE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.04%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

3.08%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08%

3.63%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

4.76%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.76%

+0.70%

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGE.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMH.DE vs. AEGE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither KLMH.DE nor AEGE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AEGE.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AEGE.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMH.DE.

KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while AEGE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMH.DE and 0.10% for AEGE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMH.DE and AEGE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer