PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEGE.DE vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEGE.DE is traded in EUR, while BNDW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNDW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEGE.DE achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 3.12% return.


AEGE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
0.70%
3Y*
1.99%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDW

1D
0.01%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.49%
YTD
3.12%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AEGE.DE
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.53%2.29%1.46%4.27%-13.83%-1.55%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
3.12%-7.44%9.18%3.97%-7.48%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AEGE.DE and BNDW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.26

The correlation between AEGE.DE and BNDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEGE.DE
AEGE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AEGE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEGE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEGE.DEBNDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.99

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

2.86

-2.24

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEGE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEGE.DE and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEGE.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -13.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEGE.DE and BNDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEGE.DEBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-13.02%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-4.45%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.94%

-11.33%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-6.23%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-5.77%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.54%

-0.41%

Volatility

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (AEGE.DE) is 1.04%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that AEGE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEGE.DEBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.44%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

4.29%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

5.77%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

8.03%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

7.80%

-3.04%

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEGE.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AEGE.DE vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

AEGE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AEGE.DE
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.24%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEGE.DE and BNDW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for AEGE.DE.

AEGE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI (EUR Hedged), while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AEGE.DE and 0.05% for BNDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEGE.DE and BNDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer