KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE
KLMH.DE (Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMH.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KLMH.DE returned 3.09%/yr vs 59.62%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLMH.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMH.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.74% return.
KLMH.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 59.12%
- YTD
- 63.74%
- 1Y
- 110.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMH.DE Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 7.19% | -19.81% | -1.57% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.74% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMH.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
KLMH.DE
LSMC.DE
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLMH.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.47 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 8.55 | -8.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 25.57 | -24.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMH.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMH.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.67% | -39.64% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -12.84% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.80% | -36.22% | +32.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.52% | -7.93% | -6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -11.34% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 4.30% | -3.07% |
Volatility
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) is 1.11%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that KLMH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMH.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 14.15% | -13.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.04% | 24.88% | -20.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 32.91% | -27.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 32.56% | -26.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 32.56% | -27.10% |
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLMH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither KLMH.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLMH.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLMH.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLMH.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
KLMH.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMH.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for KLMH.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer