KLIP vs. XLRI
KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLIP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
KLIP vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -12.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 5.32% return.
KLIP
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- 1Y
- -5.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -12.64% | 2.90% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 5.32% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLIP and XLRI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLIP vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
KLIP
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KLIP vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLIP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLIP vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLIP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -7.12% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.65% | -1.83% | -15.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -1.65% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | — | — |
Volatility
KLIP vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLIP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 10.93% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 10.93% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 10.93% | +7.17% |
KLIP vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLIP vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.68%, more than XLRI's 12.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 29.68% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.40% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLIP and XLRI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 29.68%, compared with 12.40% for XLRI.
KLIP is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KLIP and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for KLIP and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer