PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLIP vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLIP vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -12.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 5.32% return.


KLIP

1D
-0.80%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-12.64%
6M
-14.80%
1Y
-5.67%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLIP vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and XLRI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLIP vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLIP vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLIPXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

KLIP vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLIP vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLIPXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-7.12%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.65%

-1.83%

-15.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-1.65%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

Volatility

KLIP vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLIPXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

10.93%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

10.93%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

10.93%

+7.17%

KLIP vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLIP vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.68%, more than XLRI's 12.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KLIP and XLRI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.

KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 29.68%, compared with 12.40% for XLRI.

KLIP is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KLIP and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLIP and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer