PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLCIX vs. FGKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLCIX achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 24.68% return.


KLCIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
9.59%
YTD
15.11%
6M
14.03%
1Y
32.33%
3Y*
45.40%
5Y*
21.92%
10Y*
20.05%

FGKFX

1D
0.15%
1M
8.90%
YTD
24.68%
6M
21.97%
1Y
52.34%
3Y*
32.84%
5Y*
18.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KLCIX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund
15.11%18.71%90.57%33.02%-30.06%13.95%28.58%10.72%
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
24.68%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between KLCIX and FGKFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between KLCIX and FGKFX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLCIX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLCIX
KLCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
KLCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
KLCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLCIXFGKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

4.78

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

19.19

-11.79

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLCIX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLCIXFGKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.93

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.76

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.98

-0.52

Drawdowns

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLCIX drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLCIX and FGKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLCIXFGKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-40.14%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-11.40%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.04%

-27.38%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.04%

-40.14%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

0.00%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-10.02%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.83%

+1.55%

Volatility

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLCIXFGKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.46%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

14.29%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

18.60%

-3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.27%

24.14%

+28.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.69%

25.74%

+13.95%

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLCIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLCIX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

KLCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.72%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLCIX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund
25.72%29.60%72.67%29.59%26.95%14.50%3.48%4.34%11.36%1.41%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLCIX and FGKFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KLCIX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FGKFX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLCIX dropped -51.80% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLCIX and FGKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer