KLAG vs. TNA
KLAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - KLAG tracks the KLA Corporation (KLAC) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KLAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.
Performance
KLAG vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAG achieves a 156.16% return, which is significantly higher than TNA's 53.14% return.
KLAG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 47.07%
- YTD
- 156.16%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- 4.51%
- 1M
- 8.55%
- YTD
- 53.14%
- 6M
- 43.09%
- 1Y
- 130.31%
- 3Y*
- 31.74%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
KLAG vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 156.16% | -1.92% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 53.14% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAG and TNA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAG vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
KLAG
TNA
KLAG vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF (KLAG) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLAG | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.15 | 0.23 | +5.92 |
Drawdowns
KLAG vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAG drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAG and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAG | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -88.09% | +45.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.23% | +35.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -33.90% | +18.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.86% | — |
Volatility
KLAG vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAG | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.73% | 57.06% | +51.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.73% | 67.34% | +41.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.73% | 68.42% | +40.31% |
KLAG vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLAG vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
KLAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAG and TNA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for KLAG.
KLAG tracks KLA Corporation (KLAC), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KLAG and 1.14% for TNA.
Find the right allocation for KLAG and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer