KLAG vs. QTAP
KLAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. KLAG is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KLAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
KLAG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAG achieves a 161.64% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.55% return.
KLAG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -25.65%
- 6M
- 100.02%
- YTD
- 161.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- —
KLAG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 161.64% | -0.75% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.55% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAG and QTAP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
KLAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
KLAG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF (KLAG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLAG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 44.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLAG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAG drawdown since its inception was -51.10%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAG and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.10% | -29.44% | -21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.52% | -0.20% | -44.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -4.96% | -10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.48% | — |
Volatility
KLAG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.88% | 6.17% | +130.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.88% | 18.92% | +117.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.88% | 18.64% | +118.24% |
KLAG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLAG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither KLAG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
KLAG and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KLAG and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for KLAG and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer