ASML.AS vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASML.AS or LRCX.
Correlation
The correlation between ASML.AS and LRCX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASML.AS:
0.15
LRCX:
0.01
ASML.AS:
0.48
LRCX:
0.31
ASML.AS:
1.07
LRCX:
1.04
ASML.AS:
0.16
LRCX:
0.01
ASML.AS:
0.30
LRCX:
0.01
ASML.AS:
20.77%
LRCX:
21.65%
ASML.AS:
41.78%
LRCX:
43.50%
ASML.AS:
-89.99%
LRCX:
-87.91%
ASML.AS:
-28.59%
LRCX:
-33.55%
Fundamentals
ASML.AS:
€284.79B
LRCX:
$99.13B
ASML.AS:
€17.57
LRCX:
$3.09
ASML.AS:
41.22
LRCX:
24.93
ASML.AS:
1.98
LRCX:
1.48
ASML.AS:
€19.00B
LRCX:
$11.83B
ASML.AS:
€9.70B
LRCX:
$5.67B
ASML.AS:
€1.61B
LRCX:
$3.84B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML.AS achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML.AS has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 23.97%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.32% annualized return.
ASML.AS
5.01%
3.64%
-26.81%
10.84%
22.09%
23.97%
LRCX
3.07%
-2.37%
-29.94%
-1.00%
21.66%
27.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASML.AS vs. LRCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASML.AS
LRCX
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than LRCX's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML.AS ASML Holding NV | 0.88% | 0.92% | 0.87% | 1.28% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 1.19% | 1.02% | 0.83% | 0.98% | 0.85% | 0.68% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 1.16% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML.AS drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML.AS and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 10.05%. This indicates that ASML.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding NV and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities