ASML.AS vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Performance
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML.AS ASML Holding NV | 21.63% | 37.08% | 0.36% | 36.66% | -27.83% | 78.74% | 52.10% | 95.32% | -4.67% | 37.45% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 26.95% | 110.78% | -0.70% | 82.97% | -37.05% | 65.16% | 50.65% | 124.29% | -20.85% | 54.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
ASML.AS is traded in EUR, while LRCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML.AS achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML.AS has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 30.30%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 40.11% annualized return.
ASML.AS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- 21.63%
- 6M
- 35.57%
- 1Y
- 86.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.25%
- 10Y*
- 30.30%
LRCX
- 1D
- 5.94%
- 1M
- -6.48%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 6M
- 62.39%
- 1Y
- 176.98%
- 3Y*
- 57.28%
- 5Y*
- 29.13%
- 10Y*
- 40.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML.AS vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
ASML.AS
LRCX
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASML.AS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 3.26 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | 3.30 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.02 | 8.52 | -2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.97 | 27.50 | -11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASML.AS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 3.26 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.66 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.92 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML.AS and LRCX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than LRCX's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML.AS ASML Holding NV | 0.59% | 0.71% | 0.92% | 0.87% | 1.28% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 1.19% | 1.02% | 0.83% | 0.98% | 0.85% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.47% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Drawdowns
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML.AS drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -72.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML.AS and LRCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML.AS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.99% | -87.90% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -20.01% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -56.39% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.93% | -56.39% | +8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.13% | -14.26% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.74% | -28.31% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 6.33% | -0.37% |
Volatility
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) is 11.56%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 19.35%. This indicates that ASML.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASML.AS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 19.35% | -7.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.96% | 39.90% | -12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.93% | 54.57% | -16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 44.72% | -7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 43.90% | -10.30% |
Financials
ASML.AS vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding NV and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities