KJUN vs. OCTB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KJUN (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJUN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.

Performance

KJUN vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUN achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 6.18% return.

KJUN

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.65%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OCTB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUN vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJUN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June	4.15%	1.66%
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF	6.18%	2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUN and OCTB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

KJUN vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUN

KJUN Risk / Return Rank: 80
KJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
KJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
KJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
KJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
KJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUN vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KJUN	OCTB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KJUN	OCTB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.97	-1.23

Drawdowns

KJUN vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUN drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUN and OCTB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUN	OCTB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-4.79%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.17%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-0.70%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJUN	OCTB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.63%	7.20%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.87%	7.20%	+2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	7.20%	+2.67%

KJUN vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJUN vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUN nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUN and OCTB in my portfolio?

KJUN and OCTB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KJUN or OCTB?

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUN or OCTB?

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUN or OCTB?

KJUN and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJUN and OCTB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUN and 0.25% for OCTB.