KJUN vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KJUN (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. KJUN is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. Over the past year, KJUN returned 15.44% vs 13.26% for POCT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

KJUN vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUN achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 4.83% return.

KJUN

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 5.91%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 15.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUN vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KJUN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June	5.91%	3.79%	5.66%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	4.83%	11.00%	4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUN and POCT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024	0.70

The correlation between KJUN and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KJUN vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUN

KJUN Risk / Return Rank: 85
KJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
KJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
KJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 94

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUN vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KJUN	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.16	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.08	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.62	3.03	+2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.81	15.34	+7.46

KJUN vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUN and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KJUN vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUN drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUN and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUN	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-18.80%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-4.40%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.90%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-1.49%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.87%	-0.19%

Volatility

KJUN vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 1.80%. This indicates that KJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KJUN	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	1.80%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.77%	4.96%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.09%	6.19%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.00%	7.97%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	10.21%	-0.21%

KJUN vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KJUN and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

KJUN vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUN nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KJUN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUN and POCT in my portfolio?

KJUN and POCT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KJUN or POCT?

KJUN has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to POCT (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUN dropped -14.44% vs POCT's -18.80%.

Which ETF is better, KJUN or POCT?

On 1-year performance, KJUN leads with 15.44% vs 13.26% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KJUN or POCT?

Over the 1-year period, KJUN has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUN or POCT?

KJUN and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUN or POCT?

KJUN and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.