KJUL vs. BNO
KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - KJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KJUL returned 4.93%/yr vs 23.48%/yr for BNO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
KJUL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.
KJUL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 85.31%
- 6M
- 79.66%
- 1Y
- 88.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 23.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
KJUL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July | 6.53% | 7.70% | 8.69% | 11.78% | -8.44% | 2.51% | 11.61% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 85.31% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJUL and BNO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between KJUL and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJUL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
KJUL
BNO
KJUL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KJUL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.54 | 4.99 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.49 | 9.39 | +11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJUL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.15 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.14 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
KJUL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJUL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -87.06% | +70.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -17.87% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.45% | -23.75% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.69% | -33.70% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -12.72% | +12.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -40.16% | +36.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 9.48% | -8.56% |
Volatility
KJUL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 0.55%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJUL | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 14.12% | -13.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.77% | 36.21% | -31.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.99% | 41.56% | -33.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 35.40% | -23.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 36.69% | -25.02% |
KJUL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJUL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJUL nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KJUL and BNO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to KJUL (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 23.48% vs 4.93% for KJUL. On fees, KJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 23.48% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
KJUL and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 0.90% for BNO.
KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KJUL and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer