KJD vs. FUTG
KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
KJD vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
KJD
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJD vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 1.96% | -27.86% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJD and FUTG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJD vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJD | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -0.66 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
KJD vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJD | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -86.19% | +37.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.90% | -84.29% | +52.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.63% | -40.35% | +11.72% |
Volatility
KJD vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJD | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.90% | 136.01% | -73.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | 136.01% | -73.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.90% | 136.01% | -73.11% |
KJD vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJD vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJD nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KJD and FUTG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
KJD and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for KJD and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer