KJAN vs. NVDO
KJAN (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KJAN is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
KJAN vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJAN achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
KJAN
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJAN vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJAN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January | 8.07% | 6.14% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJAN and NVDO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJAN vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
KJAN
NVDO
KJAN vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KJAN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJAN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.30 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
KJAN vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJAN drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJAN and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJAN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -16.25% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -2.68% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -4.99% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | — | — |
Volatility
KJAN vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJAN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 31.93% | -21.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 31.93% | -18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 31.93% | -16.51% |
KJAN vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJAN vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
KJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KJAN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KJAN and NVDO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJAN.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for KJAN.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJAN and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for KJAN and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer