KJAN vs. JULB
KJAN (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KJAN is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
KJAN vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJAN achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.38% return.
KJAN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJAN vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJAN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January | 9.48% | 1.78% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.38% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJAN and JULB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJAN vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
KJAN
JULB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KJAN vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KJAN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KJAN vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJAN drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJAN and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJAN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -5.24% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.43% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -0.83% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility
KJAN vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJAN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.82% | 6.84% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 6.84% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 6.84% | +8.54% |
KJAN vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJAN vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJAN nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KJAN and JULB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJAN.
KJAN and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJAN and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for KJAN and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer