KIQQ vs. KWEB
KIQQ (KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KIQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. KIQQ is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KIQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KIQQ
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWEB
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- 6M
- -26.23%
- YTD
- -26.23%
- 1Y
- -22.39%
- 3Y*
- 1.36%
- 5Y*
- -14.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 7.69% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -30.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIQQ and KWEB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIQQ vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
KIQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KWEB
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and KWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -80.92% | +72.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -70.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -70.95% | +68.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -35.43% | +32.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.69% | — |
Volatility
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 27.32% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 47.71% | -31.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 40.00% | -23.97% |
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than KWEB's 8.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 4.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 8.34% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIQQ and KWEB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KIQQ.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 4.40% for KIQQ.
KIQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while KWEB is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.70% for KWEB.
Find the right allocation for KIQQ and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer