KIQQ vs. KWEB
KIQQ (KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KIQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. KIQQ is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KIQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KIQQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KWEB
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 14.01%
- 6M
- -19.47%
- YTD
- -16.33%
- 1Y
- -12.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.77%
- 5Y*
- -7.53%
- 10Y*
- 0.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.11K | $10.88K | $6.12K | |
| $554.38M | $548.17M | $693.22M |
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 2.94% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -21.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIQQ and KWEB is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIQQ vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
KIQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KWEB
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -10.02%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and KWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -80.92% | +70.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -67.05% | +60.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -35.65% | +32.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.98% | — |
Volatility
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIQQ | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 27.82% | -10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 46.99% | -30.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 40.04% | -23.14% |
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
KIQQ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than KWEB's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 5.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.36% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIQQ and KWEB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KIQQ.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 5.39% for KIQQ.
KIQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while KWEB is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.70% for KWEB.
Find the right allocation for KIQQ and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer