KIQQ vs. KLIP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

KIQQ (KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KIQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KLIP is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KIQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.

Performance

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KIQQ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -3.21%
• 6M: 3.22%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

KLIP

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 6.50%
• 6M: -11.47%
• YTD: -7.10%
• 1Y: -3.45%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF	$11.11K	$10.88K	$6.12K
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	$623.83K	$609.30K	$993.79K

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF	2.94%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KIQQ and KLIP is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026	0.42

Return for Risk

KIQQ vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KIQQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 7
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KIQQ	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.97	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.46	—

Drawdowns

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -10.02%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KIQQ	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-21.48%	+11.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-12.44%	+5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-4.32%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KIQQ	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.90%	16.59%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	17.99%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	17.99%	-1.09%

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KIQQ vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than KLIP's 27.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF	5.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	27.63%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KIQQ and KLIP in my portfolio?

KIQQ and KLIP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KIQQ or KLIP?

On fees, KIQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KIQQ or KLIP?

KIQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KIQQ or KLIP?

KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 27.63%, compared with 5.39% for KIQQ.

What is the main difference between KIQQ and KLIP?

KIQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while KLIP is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.95% for KLIP.