PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KIO vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KIO vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIO achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly higher than BRW's 4.46% return.


KIO

1D
0.18%
1M
1.89%
6M
3.57%
YTD
4.73%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
7.65%

BRW

1D
0.90%
1M
3.60%
6M
4.83%
YTD
4.46%
1Y
-3.21%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIO vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KIO
KKR Income Opportunities Fund
4.73%-2.49%18.45%31.53%-28.25%10.60%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
4.46%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between KIO and BRW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KIO vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KIO
KIO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KIO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KIO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIO vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KIOBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.97

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

-0.18

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.31

+0.74

KIO vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIO and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KIO vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIO drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIO and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KIOBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-17.74%

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-17.74%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-17.74%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

-17.74%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-7.96%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-4.06%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

10.42%

-5.33%

Volatility

KIO vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) is 2.19%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that KIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KIOBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

3.31%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

8.42%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

13.46%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

12.98%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

12.88%

+3.46%

KIO vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

KIO vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

KIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, less than BRW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.20%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KIO
KKR Income Opportunities Fund
12.95%12.58%10.90%11.32%11.44%7.45%10.12%9.51%10.53%9.66%9.92%10.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


KIO and BRW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to KIO (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIO dropped -43.87% vs BRW's -17.74%.

KIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIO and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer