KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO
KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) and YNVD.NEO (NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KILO.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while YNVD.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KILO.TO returned 18.91% vs 46.25% for YNVD.NEO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KILO.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for YNVD.NEO.
Performance
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KILO.TO achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than YNVD.NEO's 8.49% return.
KILO.TO
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- —
YNVD.NEO
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 46.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -5.68% | 60.17% | 29.51% |
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 8.49% | 39.74% | 132.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between KILO.TO and YNVD.NEO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
KILO.TO
YNVD.NEO
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KILO.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.64 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 6.34 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KILO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum YNVD.NEO drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO.TO and YNVD.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KILO.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -41.03% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.90% | -17.58% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.51% | -14.57% | -9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -9.25% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.44% | 7.31% | +2.13% |
Volatility
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) is 7.88%, while NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) has a volatility of 15.99%. This indicates that KILO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YNVD.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KILO.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 15.99% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.72% | 29.30% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.23% | 37.12% | -9.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 52.80% | -34.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 52.80% | -34.94% |
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KILO.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than YNVD.NEO's 1.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
KILO.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Dividend Comparison
KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YNVD.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 20.17% | 20.15% | 16.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KILO.TO and YNVD.NEO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for YNVD.NEO.
KILO.TO is categorized as Gold, while YNVD.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for KILO.TO and 1.94% for YNVD.NEO.
Find the right allocation for KILO.TO and YNVD.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer