KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO
KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) and BTCY.TO (Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units) are both exchange-traded funds - KILO.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while BTCY.TO is a fund fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KILO.TO returned 26.73%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for BTCY.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KILO.TO achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly higher than BTCY.TO's -33.54% return.
KILO.TO
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCY.TO
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- YTD
- -33.54%
- 6M
- -33.98%
- 1Y
- -44.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -5.68% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | 3.21% |
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | -33.54% | -9.07% | 112.59% | 111.84% | -64.51% | -18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between KILO.TO and BTCY.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between KILO.TO and BTCY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KILO.TO
BTCY.TO
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KILO.TO | BTCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.85 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.81 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | -1.42 | +3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KILO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum BTCY.TO drawdown of -71.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO.TO and BTCY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KILO.TO | BTCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -71.53% | +46.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.90% | -54.63% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.90% | -54.63% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.51% | -52.93% | +28.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -33.29% | +26.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.44% | 31.16% | -21.72% |
Volatility
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) is 7.88%, while Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that KILO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KILO.TO | BTCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 15.01% | -7.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.72% | 40.44% | -16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.23% | 48.40% | -21.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 50.97% | -32.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 50.97% | -33.11% |
Dividends
KILO.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Dividend Comparison
KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | 24.64% | 15.11% | 16.69% | 9.20% | 24.17% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KILO.TO and BTCY.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KILO.TO and BTCY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer