PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO).

KILO-B.TO and PDIV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018. PDIV.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		9.94%56.51%37.76%10.43%6.38%-4.67%21.17%12.88%8.56%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF		1.14%15.82%10.71%4.64%-4.40%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-5.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than PDIV.TO's 1.14% return.

KILO-B.TO

1D
3.80%
1M
-9.42%
YTD
9.94%
6M
21.41%
1Y
44.69%
3Y*
34.39%
5Y*
24.48%
10Y*
—

PDIV.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.00%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF

Often compared with KILO-B.TO:
KILO-B.TO vs. ZGLD.TOKILO-B.TO vs. ZGLH.TOKILO-B.TO vs. VALT.TOKILO-B.TO vs. BTCY.TOKILO-B.TO vs. ZGD.TOKILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TOKILO-B.TO vs. CGL-C.TO
Often compared with PDIV.TO:
PDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOPDIV.TO vs. SPYIPDIV.TO vs. HYLD.TOPDIV.TO vs. BMAXPDIV.TO vs. PMIF.TOPDIV.TO vs. DGSPDIV.TO vs. USCL.TO

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PDIV.TO's 0.77% expense ratio.

PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KILO-B.TO
KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KILO-B.TOPDIV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.45

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

1.99

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.74

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.62

8.94

+0.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO-B.TO and PDIV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KILO-B.TOPDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.45

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.48

0.80

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.64

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.59

+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

KILO-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF		12.30%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum PDIV.TO drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and PDIV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

KILO-B.TOPDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-30.64%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.41%

-8.36%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

-14.96%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.76%

-3.25%

-7.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-4.40%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

1.63%

+3.30%

Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 3.48%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

KILO-B.TOPDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.07%

3.48%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.98%

5.58%

+17.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

9.56%

+16.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

9.89%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

13.96%

+4.02%