PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KIE vs. IYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KIE vs. IYG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KIE (SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) and IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KIE tracks the S&P Insurance Select Industry Index while IYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KIE returned 12.08%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for IYG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KIE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYG.

Performance

KIE vs. IYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIE achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KIE has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 12.08%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.

KIE

1D
0.17%
1M
4.05%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-1.28%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
12.08%

IYG

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.92%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIE vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF		0.16%8.12%26.95%12.18%3.48%22.75%-3.04%27.19%-5.99%12.83%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF		-1.05%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%

Correlation

The correlation between KIE and IYG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between KIE and IYG has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KIE vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
KIE
IYG

Financial Services

96.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KIE
96.9%
IYG
100.0%

Healthcare

KIE
3.1%
IYG

-

Basic Materials

KIE

-

IYG

-

Communication Services

KIE

-

IYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

KIE

-

IYG

-

Consumer Defensive

KIE

-

IYG

-

Energy

KIE

-

IYG

-

Industrials

KIE

-

IYG

-

Real Estate

KIE

-

IYG

-

Technology

KIE

-

IYG

-

Utilities

KIE

-

IYG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF

Often compared with KIE:
KIE vs. IAKKIE vs. KBWPKIE vs. XLFKIE vs. IAIKIE vs. RNRKIE vs. PAVEKIE vs. JQUA
Often compared with IYG:
IYG vs. IYFIYG vs. XLFIYG vs. IXGIYG vs. VFHIYG vs. FTXOIYG vs. GABFIYG vs. IYK

Return for Risk

KIE vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KIE
KIE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KIE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KIE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIE vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

KIEIYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.13
0.61

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.29
0.92

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.12

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.59

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

1.51

-1.09

KIE vs. IYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the IYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIE and IYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KIE vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, smaller than the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIE and IYG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KIEIYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.30%

-81.84%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-15.90%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-18.54%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-29.62%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.31%

-44.32%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-4.50%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-20.71%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

6.23%

-1.31%

Volatility

KIE vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) at 4.46%. This indicates that KIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KIEIYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

4.46%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

12.15%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

15.59%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

20.42%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

23.44%

-2.28%

KIE vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

KIE vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison

KIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than IYG's 1.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF		1.09%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF		1.64%1.57%1.48%1.45%1.90%1.95%1.85%1.76%1.83%1.56%1.55%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

KIE and IYG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KIE has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to IYG (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIE dropped -75.30% vs IYG's -81.84%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 14.99% vs 12.08% for KIE. On fees, KIE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KIE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

KIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.09% for IYG.

KIE tracks S&P Insurance Select Industry Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KIE and 0.42% for IYG.

IYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIE and IYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer