KIE vs. BPAY
KIE (SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KIE is passively managed, while BPAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KIE returned 16.62%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for BPAY. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KIE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.
Performance
KIE vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KIE achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -8.93% return.
KIE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
BPAY
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- 1Y
- -18.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KIE vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 0.16% | 8.12% | 26.95% | 12.18% | 2.70% |
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -8.93% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIE and BPAY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between KIE and BPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KIE vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KIE
BPAY
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KIE
BPAY
Healthcare
KIE
BPAY
-
Basic Materials
KIE
-
BPAY
-
Communication Services
KIE
-
BPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
KIE
-
BPAY
Consumer Defensive
KIE
-
BPAY
-
Energy
KIE
-
BPAY
-
Industrials
KIE
-
BPAY
Real Estate
KIE
-
BPAY
Technology
KIE
-
BPAY
Utilities
KIE
-
BPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIE vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank
KIE
BPAY
KIE vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KIE | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.90 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.55 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | -1.04 | +1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KIE vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIE and BPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIE | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.30% | -33.62% | -41.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -33.62% | +21.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -33.62% | +20.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -23.07% | +21.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -10.73% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 17.96% | -13.04% |
Volatility
KIE vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) is 5.81%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that KIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIE | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 9.74% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 19.78% | -7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 26.00% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 24.48% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 24.48% | -3.32% |
KIE vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KIE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
KIE vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison
KIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than BPAY's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.44% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.76% | 1.83% | 1.56% | 1.55% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIE and BPAY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPAY has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to KIE (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIE dropped -75.30% vs BPAY's -33.62%.
On 3-year performance, KIE leads with 16.62% vs 9.64% for BPAY. On fees, KIE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KIE has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KIE has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KIE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 1.64% for KIE.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KIE and 0.70% for BPAY.
KIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KIE and BPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer